🔗 Share this article

"Half of my life is archived on Snapchat, and now they expect us to fork out money for it."

One-star feedback and a sense of inequity have dominated online discussion since the app became the newest tech firm to introduce fees for a feature that users previously accessed for free.

The company behind Snapchat announced in September that it would begin imposing fees users if they have exceeding five GB of saved images and videos stored as Snapchat Memories.

For many, these old snaps act as a window to the past – prompting some to accuse the company of "money-hungry tactics" in comments on digital networks and negative ratings on Google and Apple's app stores.

Alternative Options

Snapchat's parent has likened its paid storage plans to those made available by tech giants for mobile devices.

For those seeking another option for individuals avoiding fees, users can download their Memories – which for many people amount to large volumes – to their own hardware.

Snap stated that only a small number of subscribers would be impacted by the changes.

They recognized that it was "always challenging to move from accessing content at no charge to paying for it" – but suggested it would be "worth the cost" for users.

Many denouncing the move online seem to disagree.

Widespread Discontent

A web-based protest called the fee a "archival levy", with commenters describing it "Orwellian" and "absurd" – while one person promised to quit the app again.

In parallel, in a one-star evaluation on the Google Play store, a user identifying as a pseudonymous user said it felt "very unethical".

"If I know millennials right, the majority have a long history of recorded experiences on the platform," they said. "The vast majority only remained on the platform mostly for this purpose. Five gigabytes is insufficient when you have extensive collections of memories... Goodbye to the app."

Furthermore, Guste Ven, a 20-year-old aspiring reporter in a major city, shared on a social network her intention to uninstall the application.

"I decided that I needed to download all my saved content as quickly as possible," she explained. "Almost all of my teenage years have been captured through my Snapchat memories, all of the images in there are extremely valuable to me."

"The decision appears unreasonable to demand payment individuals for a service that has been free for so many years."

Uncertain Costs

Snapchat has yet to announce how much subscription tiers would cost in the UK – only that they are part of a "slow worldwide introduction".

But 23-year-old a different individual, who also lives in London, commented in a post on the video service that she would be "devastated" by such charges.

She explained that the platform had become "integrated into daily routine" since she first joined in several years ago.

While she said she accepted the service needed to make money, Amber suggested that the Memories feature holds greater significance than the corporation may have understood.

"In my opinion it's quite an unfair decision to demand payment from your users who have been consistent and engaged," she commented. "This feature is more than a name, these are our genuine personal moments."

Expert Analysis

Firms deciding to charge from users for a service that was once complimentary is a common practice, and numerous people cover the cost of services like digital backup services to backup their media content from their smartphone.

The fact of archiving content in the cloud – which some in the technology sector frequently call as merely "somebody else's computer" – is that it requires funding.

"Hosting enormous quantities of archived media on Snapchat demands considerable investment," digital strategist a tech commentator stated. "The company has to try to find a method to fund the operation of storage, bandwidth, back-ups, media distribution, security measures – the entire process."

Yet Mr Navarra indicated that imposing charges for a service that had once been complimentary, and users had been encouraged to use as such, may appear as a "misleading tactic" for many people.

"Altering the terms after users have created this extensive stored content doesn't really sit right," he said. For numerous users, he added, "Saved content is more than stored files, they're personal mementos."

The sentiment was reflected by those leaving unfavorable comments, with a user describing their saved images and clips "the most precious thing to me".

"[Memories] have every aspect of my experiences within them from happy occasions such as new additions, grieving for lost relatives, memories with friends/family, [and] my entire youth," they commented.

Research Perspective

A postdoctoral researcher, a postdoctoral researcher at Utrecht University in the Holland, said that the platform's decision demonstrates the consequences of business-oriented apps being used to save emotional private media.

"Platforms gain from this confidence, connected relationship, and expectation of continuous entry, which even incentivises certain individuals to stay on the service or keep accessing it in order to scroll back through their archive," she explained to the media. "Yet these are not altruistic protectors of personal memory."