🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to reinitiate nuclear discussions with Washington as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations produced results, and revealed recent overtures had originated from go-betweens to restart negotiations with the US government. He asserted Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran was not yet able to authorize the global atomic watchdog to inspect struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Walking a Difficult Course

Araghchi is walking a challenging route since Iran wishes not to be seen to be proceeding from a position of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen stronger defensively and psychologically from the joint assault on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Prior Talks Abruptly Ended

The earlier sessions of discussions between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that ended with the US president claiming the facilities had been obliterated. Subsequently, Western states exercised their privilege to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Suggested

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with American involvement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats claimed three times they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy the US official only for the deal to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Position

Iran's diplomats declared the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be resurrected in various formats if negotiations reopen.

Trump recently said he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but in private Iranian officials state they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from Washington either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of non-responsiveness in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Position

In his address to the conference, aimed to depict the US as a controlling nation that misuses the notion of worldwide standards, the foreign minister said the 12-day war showed the dispute could not be resolved by armed force. He stated the strikes started with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with complete American awareness and collaboration, making trust challenging to rebuild.

Dialogue Stays the Primary Solution

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had deserted diplomacy; it was the United States and the western countries that had repeatedly tried to dictate their will during the talks. Diplomacy can still be active and stays the final solution to settle disagreements, but its criteria, rules and principles must be respected."

"In case they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the language of dignity and honor, they will get a answer in the identical tone."

Repair and Recovery

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the battle of restoration and recovery, Araghchi stated he was certain Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We learned multiple understandings from this conflict; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He continued: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to eliminate, remains in place. The installations and gear, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is important is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but were unable to destroy. The nation of Iran have become more powerful, more cohesive, and more backing of the leadership and the nation in the aftermath of this invasion."