Donald Trump States Peace Proposal Is Not 'Final Offer' as Delegates Gather for Swiss Meeting
Former President Donald Trump remarked this past weekend that his Russian-prepared proposal for peace was "not my final offer", after fierce criticism from Ukraine's officials and analysts who compared it to a Munich pact of 1938 involving Chamberlain and Hitler.
During short remarks from the White House, the US president informed journalists: "We’d like to get to peace. This should have occurred earlier … we are attempting to conclude it, in any case it must be resolved."
Forthcoming Switzerland Negotiations Include Multiple Nations
Ukrainian and American delegates will meet in Geneva this Sunday for discussions on the plan. Defense representatives from Germany, France, and the UK will also participate in the talks there.
Ahead of these discussions, American lawmakers told the press that Secretary of State Rubio reached out to them while en route to Geneva to clarify the nature of this disclosed proposal. According to him, this plan "was not the administration’s plan" but rather a "wish list of the Russians", as reported by independent Maine senator Angus King, a member on the Foreign Relations Committee.
Zelenskyy Confronts Crucial Time Limit
However, the former president has set Zelenskyy until Thursday for signing the 28-point document. The document requires Ukraine to give up territory under its control to Russia, reduce its military forces, and surrender advanced weaponry. It also rules out international peacekeepers and penalties for atrocities committed by Russia.
In a sombre address on Friday, the Ukrainian leader warned that his country confronts an impossible choice in the near future involving preserving its national dignity and losing a major partner like the United States. Zelenskyy acknowledged that Ukraine is experiencing an extremely challenging period historically.
Ukraine's Dialogue Delegation Formed for Geneva Meetings
Speaking on Saturday, the president emphasized that genuine or "dignified" peace was always based on "guaranteed security and justice". He announced a negotiating team, established by presidential decree, that would soon meet its US counterparts in Geneva, headed by his chief of staff Yermak.
Another member from Ukraine's team, ex-defense head and national security council secretary Umerov, said there would be consultations with the US "on the possible parameters of a future peace agreement".
Hinting at limits, he noted: Ukraine enters these talks with defined goals. This is another stage of the dialogue that has been ongoing in recent days and is primarily aimed at aligning our vision for the next steps."
International Reaction and Concerns
The Ukrainian president has sought to participate positively with the US administration apparently intent to end the conflict based on Russian conditions. He has emphasized that he will not surrender Ukraine’s sovereignty or abandon the constitutional framework that enshrines the country’s current borders.
During a summit in South Africa, leaders from the G20 and EU representatives issued a collective declaration opposing Trump’s plan, saying it requires further refinement. It said that members of the EU and NATO must be involved on some of its provisions, which rule out Ukraine's NATO accession and impose terms on its future EU accession.
Citizen Opinion in Kyiv
Responses from Ukrainians to the proposal, prepared by a Russian representative and Trump’s representative, has been overwhelmingly hostile. Analysts said it outlined a plan for further Russian aggression: targeting not just Ukraine but of other parts of Europe as well.
Nayyem, a public figure who led Ukraine’s 2014 pro-democracy Maidan revolution, remarked it drew comparisons with the Munich Agreement. Trumps’s peace plan belonged to a similar category, with the victim invited to outline its own surrender for broader convenience.
On social media, he expressed he was outraged by the complete pardon for Russian atrocities. This offended people who had hidden in basements in Bucha or Mariupol – where Russian troops executed hundreds of civilians – and for those whose children had been forcibly deported to Russian territory. "A rather cynical agreement," he concluded.
In an interview in a Kyiv subway station, Dmytro Sariskyi, 21, commented that Russia had been trying to control Ukraine politically and territorially over many years. It conceded "barely anything" in the Trump agreement and maintained troops in Ukraine. In my view, this deal aims to undermine Ukraine and impose unfair terms, he remarked.
Should Ukraine accept the terms it would be compelled to sacrifice its liberties, he said. If it didn’t, the US might cease collaboration and intelligence exchange, a crucial source of military intelligence for Ukraine's forces. Currently, there is no favorable solution, he remarked.
Diverse Viewpoints from Ukrainian Citizens
Another passenger, 19-year-old Barchan, asserted that the country would remain resilient lacking US backing. "We will fight for as long as it takes. Crimea and the eastern regions are part of Ukraine. It belongs to Ukraine." She said Zelenskyy was a "smart person" and predicted he would not give up Ukrainian land.
While speaking in the rain, near a historical monument, Ivanovna mentioned her appreciation to Trump for his attempts to broker peace. She said that the nation should be ready ceding certain regions temporarily if it meant maintaining US support. "President Zelenskyy should hold a referendum and ask the people," she proposed.
European Leaders Criticize the Proposal
Previous European leaders have roundly condemned this proposal. Finland’s former prime minister Sanna Marin described it as a catastrophe, not only for Ukraine and Ukrainians but for democracies worldwide. She said if Western nations display vulnerability – as it did in 2014 when Putin annexed Crimea – further hostilities could arise.
Belgium's ex-PM, Guy Verhofstadt, quoted a statement by Churchill of an appeaser as "one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last". He added: Trump aligns with Putin. Europe must choose again: appeasement or our values, imperialism or freedom. Another moment of truth for our [European] union."