🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “complete double standards” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Correspondence acquired by reporters originating from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the country’s government ministers requests measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on scented cigarette varieties, and reduced sanctions for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“As an elected official, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” stated the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in circulating through civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during broader worries about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. In recent weeks, WHO officials issued a warning that the smoking product companies was escalating campaigns to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“Evidence exists of corporate influence globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN summit conference,” said the tobacco industry watchdog.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the cost might be borne in human lives who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be lowered to less than half “following international suggested parameters”, delayed for at least twelve months after the law is enacted.

International experts specifically advises a warning should cover at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy 65% of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the withdrawal of extensive controls on scented smoking items, suggesting that it would drive users to “illegally traded” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The proposed legislation proposes sanctions for various offences “ranging from a portion of yearly revenue to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Company justification

Via documentation, the managing director of British American Tobacco Zambia says the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “supports the objectives of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the related medical consequences” but maintains that “specific rules can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “undermine this law so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations existed in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he commented.

“We exist in a international community. If I plant tobacco in my garden and gather the crop and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the Britain or other nations had not resulted in corporate closures, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator commented: “BAT Zambia conducts its business in compliance with applicable local laws. Additionally, the corporation engages in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which enable stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not resisting legislation”, they said, adding that minors should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We advocate for developing rules to achieve intended public health goals, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on corporations, customers and associated groups,” they said, noting that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which includes increasing amounts of illicit trade”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.